The following question refers to a hypothetical situation. The 2010 Supreme Court case, Wagner v. Tritch, involves the illegal distribution of copyrighted material to foreign consumers via the Internet, which is a new area of law. The 9-0, unanimous vote on the Court is set to overturn the lower appellate court decision that Augustus Tritch was liable for millions of dollars to the plaintiff, Frederick Von Wagner, for illegally distributing his book to overseas customers. Now that the court has voted on the case, explain what must happen next? Describe the different types of opinions that could come from the Court.

The authors of the paper "fudging the numbers: distributing chocolate influences student evaluations of an undergraduate course"† carried out a study to see if events unrelated to an undergraduate course could affect student evaluations. students enrolled in statistics courses taught by the same instructor participated in the study. all students attended the same lectures and one of six discussion sections that met once a week. at the end of the course, the researchers chose three of the discussion sections to be the "chocolate group." students in these three sections were offered chocolate prior to having them fill out course evaluations. students in the other three sections were not offered chocolate. the researchers concluded that "overall, students offered chocolate gave more positive evaluations than students not offered chocolate." indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. give a brief explanation for your choice.