Social Studies, 14.07.2020 14:01 NeriyahY

For prior restraint to apply, what must the government prove about the speech in question? The speech must be libelous. The speech must present a general threat. The speech must present a clear and identifiable danger. The speech must be offensive.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Government, if it wants to prove any prior restraint to be applied the speech that the government declares is presented in a clear and identifiable danger. So, the correct option is C.

The restrictions that a government wants to apply can be portrayed to the general public in very clear and identifiable manner that a threat is really a concerned matter.

For example if there is a demonetization in the country to curb the rate of corruption in the nation, the speech by the supreme leader of the country must clearly state that govt. considers it as threat.Such threat of corruption should be conveyed to public in simple terms that explains that corruptions can lead to downfall in the economy. Another example is of a pandemic that has hit the country.If there is a need to instate lockdown in the country to avoid virus outbreak, the speech has to be clearly indicative of threats and deaths that can take place due to such virus.

Hence, the correct option is C that the speech of the government has to be clearly identifying the danger about prior restraint that has to be applied for control of situations.

To know more about government speech, click the link below.

link

Answer from: Jacobstoltzfus

- The speech must present a clear and identifiable danger.

Explanation:

'Prior restraint' is characterized as the government's authority to suppress or prohibit the forms of expression like speech, writing, art, media prior to being published or broadcasted if it poses a threat to national security or community.

The First Amendment of the United States constitution provides this liability to the government to impose censorship or judicially suppress the forms of expression like speech is evaluated or restricted before it is presented in order to give priority to national security and safety of the citizens of the country.

In reference to the above definition, the government is liable to prove the speech in question only when 'the speech offers a clear and identifiable danger to national security, community, or citizens.'

Answer from: Quest

hello again!

a is your answer!

Answer from: Quest

answer; ///(c) i believe that the correct answer is ethnic relations bear many similarities across different global; good luck

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:00

Which of the following is one of the innovations that neolithic farmers become more productive? a) plow b) windmill c) tractor d) reaper

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30

Question 12 chach os) (amencan money lo 4 hc which of the following scenarios would be most likely to cause a small bank to be less willing to loan money to small businesses in a community? or the bank cannot sell the loan to some other bank at the bank cannot make profit on the loan ut the customer has too much in savings in the community cannot grow from the loan

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30

On a supply and demand graph, equilibrium is the point where the two curves meet. the supply curve begins. the supply curve ends. the demand curve ends.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30

The development of simple stone tools by early hominids led to the ability to procure meat more efficiently. this in turn led to the change in diet that included larger amounts of protein. many scholars believe that this shift in diet was a significant part of how our ancient ancestors adapted so quickly to a varied set of environments, and thus were able to begin cultural development. this demonstrates the intimate connection between

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

For prior restraint to apply, what must the government prove about the speech in question? The speec...

Questions