A court decides to interpret a law in a way that encourages the limitation of a judge’s power. The court relies on similar past rulings and stays very close to the literal meaning of the Constitution in its approach. This court is engaging in judicial:
a) restraint.
b) review.
c) activism.
d) precedent.

d) precedent.

Explanation:

Precedent refers to a court ruling quoted as a constitutional power for the legal principle encapsulated in it. The decision is made in the judicial precedent through observing the related cases that have occurred in the past. The precedent doctrine, which is also known as stare judgment, i.e. abide by the ruling, is founded on the doctrine that it should be similar cases should be decided alike. There is a concept called stare decision principle that claims that the ruling of the court serves as precedent to be followed in similar cases in the future.

answer; /// i believe its(c) policymakers prioritize the various problems facing the state;

acts of terrorism occur globally. the united nations global counter-terrorism strategy was created in order to build adequate systems of support and solidarity with victims of terrorism. here´s a summary of the proposed key themes: the importance of giving victims a face and a voice; protecting their dignity; giving victims legal status and defending their legal rights; providing victims with medical, psycho-social and financial support; building solidarity with victims; improving media coverage of victims; and focusing on the link between victims and counter-terrorism efforts more generally.