subject
Social Studies, 18.07.2020 02:01 mine9226

The defendant was on trial for driving while intoxicated and injuring a pedestrian. The pedestrian claimed that the defendant was driving the car; however, the defendant's spouse testified at trial that she had been driving the car at the time of the accident and had not consumed any alcohol that evening. In response, the prosecution calls a friend of the defendant's spouse to testify that the spouse told the friend that she and the defendant had changed seats in the car after the incident and that she remained in the driver's seat until the police arrived. Is the testimony admissible? A. Admissible for impeachment purposes only.
B. Admissible to show bias.
C. In-admissible, because a witness who is available to testify can be impeached only through cross-examination.
D. In-admissible, because the witness must be given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement.

.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
Why is this statement not a hypothesis? sunflowers require soil and plenty of sunlight and water to grow and thrive. a. it is a well-known fact. b. it is a proven theory. c. it is not falsifiable. d. it is difficult to test.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Segregation or discriminatory practices that occur even when there is no explicit legal enforcement
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Which common characteristic of renaissance buildings does this image show
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Does increased security engender feelings of increased safety or does it increase the fears that people have?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The defendant was on trial for driving while intoxicated and injuring a pedestrian. The pedestrian c...
Questions
question
Computers and Technology, 31.01.2020 20:48
Questions on the website: 13722367