What is the role of a citizen in the development of a state?Explain.

The list of roles of a citizen in the development of a state with description are as follows:

As a responsible citizen, it is the moral and legal duty to raise voice for truth and justice by peaceful and democratic way. This activities helps to avoid injustice, social problems etc from the country.

The government needs certain amount of budget to carry out development activities and run the administration. For this purpose, government collects tax from the people. So, as a responsible citizen, we have to pay the tax to the government in time regularly according to the law of the country, which helps the government to fulfill the needs of people.

It is the duty of good citizen to obey the law of the nation, which are formulated by the parliament of the country. The laws are made to maintain peace and order in the country.

We should serve our nation according to our ability. Different organs of country safeguard the nation and people . So we , the citizen should help the government to maintain law and order and carry out different developmental works.

It is the right and duty of every citizen ( 18 years old and above) to cast their vote without any external pressure and influence of temptation to elect right representative.

The government brings different plans and policies for the development of country. So, as a responsible or dutiful citizen, we should participate in such activities to make such plans and policies successful.

As a dutiful citizen, we have to raise our strong voice against the border encroachment.

Hope this helps

Good luck on your assignment...

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )