Luciana is trying to decide whether to vote for a political candidate. Based on what she has read about him, she has concluded that he is not qualified for the position, but she agrees with his political positions. Also, she trusts him and likes his decisive personality. In fact, she likes him so much that she sent a small donation to his campaign. Luciana's opinion that the candidate is not qualified represents the component of her attitude toward him.

Cognitive

Explanation:

In scientific studies, Social Psychology is the study of how the behavior of a person, his/her thoughts, and feelings are influenced by the real, imagined, or implied presence of others.

There are three components of attitude. They are the Affective, cognitive and behavioural component.

An attitude can be defined as the way we think ot view object. It is the way we see, view of evaluate an attitude object either negatively or positively.

The cognitive component of attitudes can simply be defined as the beliefs, thoughts/attribute that an individual has towards an attitude object. It is an opinion which one has towards an attitude.example is Jane believe that volunteering as a Doctor in hurricane disaster is a good, positive, social and best thing to do as it will profit the society.

a. the moon was locked into orbit by the earths gravity as it was passing by and capture hypothesis i think

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.