An investigator is confronted with a life-threatening situation that necessitates using a test article in a human subject who is unable to provide informed consent and there is no time to obtain consent for the individual's legal representative. Under the FDA regulations, describes the best course of action for the investigator.

The  Institutional Review Board will be notified later.

Explanation:

The objective of informed consent provides sufficient information to a potential subject and enables that individual to make an informed choice about involvement in research. When both the investigator and an independent practitioner confirm the condition entails the application of the test article. In such circumstances, an exception can be made for informed consent under the  Food and Drug Administration regulations.

dude you should crop your image so only the question shows. but   can you explain it better

abolish

do away with

unanimous

in complete agreement

secede

separate; break free

inauguration

starting a new position with a formal ceremony.

cooperationist

people who wanted the north to cooperate with the south

surrender

to give up

volunteer

perform a service for free

draft

involuntary service in military

retreat

withdraw; move away from enemy

advisor

expert who gives advice

explanation: