Select the correct answer. Read this paragraph, and then answer the question that follows. In 322 BC, Chandragupta Maurya founded the Mauryan dynasty. The central government formed by Chandragupta Maurya provided a stable and unified nation. This political and military unity allowed all kinds of trade to expand and thrive. Internal trade also improved because of the single currency that Chandragupta established in India. Trade along the Silk Road grew because of the decreased number of bandits on the roads. What can be best inferred from this passage?

This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.  

Select the correct answer. Read this paragraph, and then answer the question that follows. In 322 BC, Chandragupta Maurya founded the Mauryan dynasty. The central government formed by Chandragupta Maurya provided a stable and unified nation. This political and military unity allowed all kinds of trade to expand and thrive. Internal trade also improved because of the single currency that Chandragupta established in India. Trade along the Silk Road grew because of the decreased number of bandits on the roads.

What can be best inferred from this passage?

A. Mauryas wanted to form a good relationship with their neighbors.

B. The expansion of trade brought about political unity in India.

C. Chandragupta encouraged external trade to control the Silk Road.

D. Internal and external trade developed productivity and economic activity in India.

D. Internal and external trade developed productivity and economic activity in India.

Explanation:

This passage focuses on the benefits brought by the Mauryan dynasty. Given that the formation of a central government led to political and military unity and therefore to an improvement on internal and external trade, it could be inferred that productivity and economic activity improved as a result of that growing trade.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

more than 1 person for sure