Fiona receives an email from her manager, Robert, asking her to meet and discuss a past project. Unfortunately, Fiona is struggling to complete a project that is due that afternoon and replies stating that she is too busy to meet that day. Robert is not pleased with Fiona's refusal to meet him and tells another coworker that he thinks Fiona is very arrogant. Robert is making a(n) attribution of Fiona.

Which of the following was not a part of the armistice between germany and the allies? a. germany had to agree to the terms of the treaty of brest-litovsk. b. germany had to surrender its entire submarine fleet to the allies. c. kaiser wilhelm ii had to give his throne. d. all german troops had to be withdrawn from the western front.

The belmont principle of beneficence requires that: a. subjects derive individual benefit from study participation.b. potential benefits justify the risks of harm.c. the study makes a significant contribution to generalizable knowledge.d. risks are managed so that they are no > minimal.

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.