Ms. Coulter was successful using a token reinforcement system with Jordan to decrease his inappropriate behaviors in her class. Mr. Johnson is now going to implement the same token system in his class in hopes that Jordan's behavior will improve. This is an example of what generalization technique? Group of answer choices

This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:

Ms. Coulter was successful using a token reinforcement system with Jordan to decrease his inappropriate behaviors in class. Mr. Johnson is now going to implement the same token system in his class in hope that Jordan's behavior will improve. This is an example of what generalization technique?

a. train loosely

b. sequentially modify

c. introduce to naturally maintaining contingencies

d. mediate generalization

This is an example of:

b. sequentially modify

Explanation:

Sequential modification refers to the implementation of a certain system or procedure in different settings, expecting similar results to occur. For instance, a certain reinforcement system was applied at school. It generated a change in behavior at school, but not at home. Then, it is applied at home with the purpose of generating a change of behavior there as well. This is what we have in the passage provided. Mr. Johnson wishes to obtain the same or similar results to Ms. Coulter's by applying the same token reinforcement system.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals