subject
Social Studies, 29.08.2020 23:01 kingjonesjr

When assessing the potential for harm, the researcher should . proceed when the potential benefit outweighs the potential harm proceed only when they are confident that no harm will result proceed only when the harm potential is psychological and not physical never proceed when harm is more than minimally possible

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00
In the spring of 1989, thousands of protesters gathered in tiananmen square in beijing, china. they rallied around a plaster statue that resembled the statue of liberty which they called “the goddess of democracy.” these protestors were seeking a) united states assistance in gaining better health care. b) economic reforms which would allow more chinese exports. c) the boycott of the future olympic games scheduled for beijing. d) political reforms to allow more freedom of speech and political representation.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30
Why do you think that wilson 14 point plan was not put into practice
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
The passage below can be revised to make it more concise. which word is a modifier that can be eliminated because it adds no meaning? dr. madison is somewhat skeptical about stories of global warming. she has gathered scientific data in remote areas to prove her position. somewhat global scientific remote
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:10
Where do the majority of cases heard by the supreme court originate?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
When assessing the potential for harm, the researcher should . proceed when the potential benefit ou...
Questions
question
Biology, 13.03.2020 06:26
question
English, 13.03.2020 06:26
Questions on the website: 13722362