Which of the following statements most accurately describes how the Court has treated statutes that disadvantage indigents?(A) Indigency is a suspect classification triggering strict scrutiny.(B) The Court has been sympathetic to claims of indigents when the state imposes a substantial fee before it confers an important benefit, but the Court has been unwilling to use the equal protection clause to help indigents achieve a minimum standard of living.(C) The Court has been particularly unreceptive to claims based on indigency, and his consistently treated statutes denying benefits to indigents to rational basis review.(D ) Indigency has been recognized as a quasi-suspect classification, and the level of scrutiny is similar to that used in gender cases.(E) The Court has stated that it will use a "sliding scale" analysis in cases involving indigents.

(B) The Court has been sympathetic to claims of indigents when the state imposes a substantial fee before it confers an important benefit, but the Court has been unwilling to use the equal protection clause to help indigents achieve a minimum standard of living.

Explanation:

Formal written enactments issued by legislative authorities governing the legal entities of state, city or county by way of consent is called statue. They declare a policy, prohibit or command something. Statues are different from case laws and regulations as regulations are issued by government agencies while case laws are issued by precedent.

Example of statue:

If a police officer stops you for driving a broken vehicle and he cites that driving such vehicle is prohibited by law. Such law is established by legislatures and it is formally written, this law is an example of statutory law.

yes

it is because 3 because the citizen the northern democratic party watned the warning on red to blue because it is purple. lol

answer; negative punishment;