Native Americans originally believed in communal land rights in which everyone shared the land) According to this document, if Indian land was advantageous for agricultural and grazing purposes, what would the US government do to tribal lands? How does this change or alter the culture of the Native Americans? Do you think this is fair? Why or why not?

b) trade is easy because of the direct line between their major ports. bilateral trade reached 89,6 thousand million.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

explanation:

i believe the primary and secondary sectors

a small town is a good definition for new france in 1750. new france was the area colonized by france in north america. the area is nowadays the city of quebec in canada.