PLZZ HELP how did The Federalists and Anti-Federalist feel differently about the Constitution. Please briefly describe how each group felt and why they felt this way. Be sure to give 2 examples of why each group felt the way they did.

The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. Others argued that a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the despotism of Great Britain they had fought so hard to remove themselves from. And still others feared that the new government threatened their personal liberties.

Explanation:

- world peace, cause that's important

- iron man to still be alive, cause i cried my eyes out

- for those in starving places like africa to get the support that they need for food and water, cause they r humans and need those basic things go be alive.

the answer to your question is,

old stone age.

-mabel < 3