The statement below are from the 1776 Virginia Declaration of Rights. "1) that in all capital or criminal prosecutions a man hath a right to demand... Evidence in his favor, and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury... 2)That legislative, executive, and judiciary department shall be separated and distinct... 3) That the freedom of the press is one of the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained 4) That well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state Which statement guarantees a right first granted by the Magna Carta?

How would having more railroad tracks be advantageous during a war

As well as a constitutional human right to associate with whomever you , there should be a corresponding right to disassociate if you .” - lester maddox which statement about lester maddox is best supported by information from the quotation? question 1 options: lester maddox was a segregationist. lester maddox enforced the constitution. lester maddox believed in the freedom to associate. lester maddox supported the 1964 civil rights act.

Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)