Birthright citizenship the process of gaining citizenship to a country because one was born there has sparked numerous debate about the effect of immigration on the country should the United States retain Birthright citizenship? please can you give fast it urgent

Yes, the country should retain birthright citizenship because otherwise, it leaves many people disenfranchised and without the protections of being a citizen of a state.

Explanation:

Birthright citizenship or jus soli is an important principle in citizenship law because it is a means to prevent discrimination based on national origins or ethnic identity. It is a more inclusive framework for establishing citizenship rights because otherwise, some newborns for example could be born somewhere and have no legal rights and it can endanger them. In theory, someone born where there is no jus soli may never find a state where they can have citizenship rights and thus remain stateless or not a natural of any country in the world. There are more than 10 million people in the world who do not have any citizenship, like the children of Syrian refugees born in Germany, for example.

i’m   sure probably just geuss and see which one you can get right, i’m pretty sure it is the combination of goods and services