Consider whether any country has an exclusive right to knowledge and/or science. Can a single nation or, for that matter, a small group of nations, stop scientific progress in other nations? On what moral and/or legal grounds can they inhibit or prohibit other countries from developing new technologies that can challenge their monopoly on these technologies? In short, shouldn’t all nations, no matter how rich or poor, have the same rights to technologically advance themselves? If not, why not?

right comes with a limitation by the virtue of ethics.

Explanation:

Yes, every country has an exclusive right to knowledge and/or science. However, this right comes with a limitation by the virtue of ethics.

If advancements in science and technology are for the betterment of the people and countries, then there is no limit to enhancing thier potentials. The only way to prohibit other countries from developing new technologies is if such advancements are threathening to mankind and the world.

This is because countries with radical ideologies or governments can be a potential threat to other nations. With great advancement in science and technology, they might use it for thier selfish motives. Therefore, no matter how rich or poor, every country should have the same rights to technologically advance themselves but with certain rules and regulations.

its a hope it good luck

the aksumite empire was an ancient kingdom located in what is now northern ethiopia from the period of 100 ad to 940 ad. its capital was the city of aksum. the kingdom established itself as one of the 4 great powers at its time, along with persia, rome, and china.

the kingdom was rich in goods like gold, iron, and salt. it established strong commercial ties with the regions governed by rome, egypt, and persia (arabia). aksum was a key location in this commercial network. trade was also facilitated with the introduction of the aksumite currency.