subject
Social Studies, 05.11.2020 23:00 shontelsims

2. Which statement best explains why we have a system of checks and balances? A. The legislative, executive, and judicial branches have equal power.
B. The legislative, executive, and judicial branches each have their own set of powers that is
different from the other branches
C. The legislative, executive, and judicial branches are designed to make sure no branch has
more power than another branch
D. Except for the Supreme Court, the legislative branch has the power to establish federal
courts.
Defend your choice by citing evidence from the text and explain your reasoning?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
Which type of learning occurs when you observe how other people act?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:20
Base your answer for this question on the statement below and on your knowledge of social studies.my fellow citizens, events in iraq have now reached the final days of decision. for more than a decade, the united states and other nations have pursued patient and honorable efforts to disarm the iraqi regime without war. that regime pledged to reveal and destroy all its weapons of mass destruction as a condition for ending the persian gulf war in 1991.…— president george w. bush, march 17, 200344 which action did president george w. bush take following this statement?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00
Which factor contributed to the rise of african empires such as ghana and mali ? a. their creation and involvement in trade networks b. they focused only on agricultural production. c. they didn’t engage in warfare with other nations d. their geographic location protected them from attacks.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
2. Which statement best explains why we have a system of checks and balances? A. The legislative, e...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.01.2021 17:20
question
Mathematics, 21.01.2021 17:20
question
English, 21.01.2021 17:20
question
Chemistry, 21.01.2021 17:20
question
Social Studies, 21.01.2021 17:20
question
Business, 21.01.2021 17:20
question
History, 21.01.2021 17:20
question
Social Studies, 21.01.2021 17:20
question
Social Studies, 21.01.2021 17:20
Questions on the website: 13722360