DO YOU KNOW ?

Chris, a master at office gossip and innuendo, says, "we know we have a corporate spy someplace in the organization, probably on the management team itself. there is no evidence that it is audrey. in fact, she's too clean, if you know what i mean. somebody should fire audrey; she's got to be the spy." by making this argument chris is actually engaging in (a) an appeal to emotion fallacy (b) a straw man fallacy (c) an appeal to ignorance fallacy (d) circular reasoning (e) an appeal to the mob fallacy

Provide an example of how you have successfully taken into account individual differences in dealing with people. in what way did your approach make a difference in the outcome of the interaction with that person?

If we can't separate our civilized self from our savage self which will take over and why