Which most likely explains why some countries lack opposition parties? A. They lack popular support. B. They destroy the election process. C. They oppose the interests of the people. D. They are prohibited by law.

D. They are prohibited by law.

Explanation:

They are seen to be limited by the country/government laws. These laws and countries are simply seen to practice autocracy and a certain number of country are seen to practice this system; example is China. This leadership system is directly seen in involvement of having uncontrolled power and also unlimited access as a single monarch/leader as the case may be. Therefore, any state or country that does not accommodate an opposition party system can be simply seen to run an autocrat system if government.

texas governor sam houston opposed secession, but was unable to prevent it. in this speech, given prior to lincoln's election, he presents the argument that slavery would be safer within the united states than outside of it. it was a prescient argument, and one held by several other southern leaders.

have a good day pls vote me brailyest

i dont know sorry why dont you looking it up on google