What evidence would offer proof for the different theories about the origins of the Indo-Aryans?

Explanation:

Historians have taken different views on the origins of the Indo-Aryans. In the past, many historians accepted the Aryan invasion theory, but many historians today reject this idea. This theory held that the Indo- Aryans were nomadic warriors who crossed the mountains into India. They used horse-drawn chariots and iron weapons to defeat the local people.

Others have argued that the Aryans were India’s original inhabitants.

They say that if the Indo-Aryans came from a region outside of India,

the Vedas would refer to it. The Vedas, however, do not make any

mention of such a place.

More recently, scholars suggest a third theory, which suggests Indo-

Aryans were originally from what is now Afghanistan and Central Asia.

Over many centuries, they migrated into India with their livestock,

mixed with local people, and adopted local beliefs. Local people

adopted the Indo-Aryan language. Over time, people across a large

part of the Indian subcontinent came to see themselves as Indo-Aryans.

So the evidence for the first theory is:  This theory held that the Indo- Aryans were nomadic warriors who crossed the mountains into India. They used horse-drawn chariots and iron weapons to defeat the local people.

second theory: They say that if the Indo-Aryans came from a region outside of India, the Vedas would refer to it. The Vedas, however, do not make any

mention of such a place.

Third theory: Over many centuries, they migrated into India with their livestock, mixed with local people, and adopted local beliefs. Local people

adopted the Indo-Aryan language. Over time, people across a large

part of the Indian subcontinent came to see themselves as Indo-Aryans.

if you don't understand just reread the passage I put in. Hope this helps :)

- "ethical issues. deception – the participants actually believed they were shocking a real person and were unaware the learner was a confederate of milgram's. however, milgram argued that “illusion is used when necessary in order to set the stage for the revelation of certain difficult-to-get-at-truths.” "

- "milgram's work was conducted in the early 1960s before the current.the studies ignited a debate about the ethical treatment of participants. what appear to be dangerous, if not deadly, electric shocks and the by today's ethical standards, many questions about the research have gone unanswered."

in brief the senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other bills.

explanation:

the topics being handled in article 1, section 7, of the u.s constitution, revolve around two issues: the first, the correct procedure to pass legislation regarding revenue production through tax, and the second, the correct process for creating and passing law. in the first case, the text of the constitution literally states that all bills regarding the raising of money, or revenue, need to first be proposed by the house of representatives, although the senate may also play a role here by either proposing such a bill to the house, or agreeing with one being proposed by the house. the second portion, speaks about the process to create, pass and enact legislation. the bill must first be raised by one of the houses, then it must be voted by the plenaries of both houses, and then, it must be presented to the president of the united states, who will either accept it, or veto it, and send it back for reconsideration. if it is not sent back, then the bill is passed into law. if sent back by the president, then the house where the bill originated from will vote again, and if passed by two thirds of the majority, then it goes to the other house, with the observations from the president, for voting. if it passes there as well, then, the bill becomes law, with a few exceptions. this is what is explained in article i, section 7, of the u.s constitution.

hope this have a great