subject
Social Studies, 15.11.2020 06:00 PoTubbs

How would a lawmaker use casework, pork-barrei legislation, logrolling, and the assignment of federal grants and contracts to his or her district in a bid for reelection?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:00
Doing the text now can someone me
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
1. what was the premise behind the recording industry association of america’s lawsuit against napster? 2. based on your knowledge of how napster worked, if you downloaded a copy of a song from a friend’s hard drive using napster, would you be infringing on the musician’s or record company’s copyright? 3. describe the scope of the digital millennium copyright act and what or whom it protects. 4. what was the link between the digital millennium copyright act and the napster legal proceedings? 5. what are the legal implications of napster’s online music-sharing service?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:50
The most effective way for individuals to influence the outcome of the protectiveequipment proposal is toa.b.c.d.circulate a petitionjoin a political partymake a presentation to the school boardwrite a letter to their provincial government representative
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
How would a lawmaker use casework, pork-barrei legislation, logrolling, and the assignment of federa...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.10.2019 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722359