Does the Necessary and proper clause quoted in this excerpt comfort or upset the author? Why?

1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.

2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers

3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.  

4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.

5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.

Part Two

1. Unnecessary and dangerous

2. From the Federalist No.84

3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.

4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.

5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.

the arab empire adopted the muslim religion as their main belief. arabs would influence the people from the territories they invaded towards islam (the muslim belief).

nevertheless, throughout the history of the arab empire, rulers brought intellectual individuals from other religions to their centers of learning. these other foreigners included jews, christians, greeks, persians, and indians.   these resulted in the adoption of important knowledge developed by these cultures by the arabic empire. for example, the works of aristotle were translated from greek to arab and indian scientists brought the numerical concept of "zero" to the arabs.

nowadays, 93% of the arab population is muslim, which at the same time is subdivided in sects including the sunni, zaini, alawi, shia. the remaining 7% is composed mainly of christians.

its tr3way you already know