guys lets copy and paste this around ค้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้ ้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎­๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎๎๎­๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎­๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎­๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํ­ ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ­ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ ํํ ค้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้ ้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎\ค้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้ ้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้­ ้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎

Successis toeffort as failure is to: a,devotion b, disaster c, chance, laziness

An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.

Based on your approved case, create fictitious digital evidence. you may use logs from your own computer (no personal information) as a guide or search the internet for samples. these samples do not have to be technically correct, but there must be a reasonable presumption that this information would exist, supported by a reference. document who, when, and how the evidence was obtained. remember, you are creating fictitious examples, so refer to prior reading or examples of how digital evidence was collected. if necessary, refer to the "who" as a "systems administrator" and ensure the fictitious person is identified and referenced in your investigation. digital evidence must meet each of the following criteria: some of your digital evidence must be retrieved by computer forensics. some of your digital evidence must be retrieved from log files. digital evidence must contain information to support who, what, when, where, and how the cyber-crime was committed. present digital copies of your evidence in text files, screen shots, or pdfs.