Why was King John forced to sign the Magna Carta? A.
He had raised an army without approval from other government officials.

B.
He had seized the lands of nobles.

C.
He had raised taxes.

D.
He had granted greater privileges to nobles over clergy.

Answer asap! what was one main difference between japanese and european feudalism? a)japanese feudalism emerged out of a period of violence; european feudalism did not.b)japanese feudalism was influenced by religions other than christianity.european feudalism involved the exchange of land for services; c)japanese feudalism did not.d)japanese samurai and european knights did not follow similar codes of conduct.

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

Explain why the judicial branch is considered the weakest branch. explain what might happen if the judicial branch could not separate itself from the other two branches. explain how a strong judiciary branch would maintain limited government and individual rights. explain why a law that contradicts the constitution must be ruled invalid. explain why the legislature may not determine if its laws are unconstitutional. hamilton argues that the judicial branch is not above the legislative branch. explain his reasoning. how is the problem solved when two laws passed by the same legislature contradict each other? explain why hamilton believes it is pointless to argue the power of judicial review will enable judges to rule in ways that serve their own interests. explain how life tenure is necessary for the judicial branch to be able to protect individual rights against a majority. explain how everyone benefits when the rights of individuals or groups are protected. explain how limited terms of office might discourage the best-qualified people.