subject

During the Golden Age, Baghdad was: a
b

a small city not important to the caliphate
ruled by the Mongols, who protected the ways of the Rashidun caliphate
a center of learning, cultural blending, and trade
an isolated city shut off from the rest of the world
d

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
Push-and-pull factors contribute to
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30
What was governor faubus’s public stance on integration of central high school?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30
Jesse james, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. as a newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for prosecuting mr. james. you announce your decision not to seek the death penalty in this case, but under your state’s law, the offense charged is considered special circumstances, which would qualify as a death penalty case. your decision does not sit well with the law enforcement community.what are the potential hearings that might be involved in this case? be sure to describe them from the time of arrest through appeal.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
During the Golden Age, Baghdad was: a
b

a small city not important to the caliph...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.08.2019 08:30
question
English, 28.08.2019 08:30
question
History, 28.08.2019 08:30
Questions on the website: 13722362