subject
Social Studies, 03.01.2021 21:30 abdulbasharee99

Which of the following explains why the Articles of Confederation were weak? A: The Congress taxed the states too heavily after the war
B: The Congress heavily restricted trade with trade
C: Each state had one vote and could not agree on important issues
D: Each state had two votes in the Congress, but only certain states could use both at the same time

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
Which number identifies the guyot? a. 1 b. 2 c. 3 d. 4 e. 5 f. 6
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
What policy did "jim crow" laws put in place? black codes integration segregation 2. the supreme court case that established the doctrine of "separate but equal" was dred scott v. sandford plessy v. ferguson brown v. board of education 3. the supreme court case that overturned the doctrine of "separate but equal" wasdred scott v. sandford plessy v. ferguson brown v. board of education
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00
Match the philosopher with his ideas, achievement, or events in his life. aristotle
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which of the following explains why the Articles of Confederation were weak? A: The Congress taxed...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 07.01.2021 03:50
question
Mathematics, 07.01.2021 03:50
question
Mathematics, 07.01.2021 03:50
Questions on the website: 13722361