Please view the attached document and answer the following questions, Question 1: Isn’t plagiarism a "victimless crime?" Why should judges care if attorneys submit plagiarized legal briefs or motions? Please explain your answer.
Question 2: Attorney Peter Cannon was punished by the court and by the attorney disciplinary board. Do you think these punishments (taken as a whole) were too lenient, too severe, or about right? Please explain your answer.
Question 3: The Iowa Supreme Court referred to another case involving attorney plagiarism (Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Lane). In that case, the punishment for attorney Lane (suspension of his license to practice) was more severe than the punishment imposed on attorney Cannon. What distinction did the court make between these two cases? Do you agree with the court’s reasoning?
Question 4: The state of Florida requires "personal appearances before the [disciplinary] board for public reprimands for disciplined lawyers" [italics added]. Do you think this kind of public shaming is too harsh?
instructions:
please provide in-text citations
plagiarism free
Don’t use any internet source, please give answer from the attached file.
length: 1-2 paragraph only

Describir textbook icon_person describe what these people are doing or feeling using an expression with tener. lecion 3

Because jaedyn is a sociable, gregarious child, she tends to be noticed by her teachers and peers. how does jaedyn interact with her environment?

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?