In a rainforest, some plants grow in the canopy while other plants grow on the forest floor. These two areas cause plants to go through photosynthesis at different rates. Which statement reasonably explains this difference? The canopy plants get less radiant energy and produce less oxygen than the plants on the forest floor

The canopy plants get more radiant energy and produce more oxygen than the plants on the forest floor.

The canopy plants get more radiant energy and produce less oxygen than the plants on the forest floor.

The canopy plants get less radiant energy and produce more oxygen than the plants on the forest floor.

whats the question?

i can't if i don't know the question.

answer; by working independently, the states have a high likelihood of developing innovative solutions that can be employed in other states;

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

i do believe the correct answer is the spread of chinese culture throughout asia and africa.good luck

explanation: