subject
Social Studies, 12.01.2021 22:00 Melleeroo

Alvarado was charged and put on trial for murder. His attorney believed that Alvarado's confession should be thrown out because he had not been read his Miranda Rights. The trial court judge refused to grant this request; he ruled that Alvarado was not in custody at the time of the interview. Thanks to the evidence in his confession, Alvarado was convicted of second-degree murder. Why did the court allow Alvarado’s confession to be used as evidence?

He was not in custody at the time of the confession.
His parents were not been present when he confessed.
He had not asked to be read his Miranda rights.
He felt pressured into confessing his crime.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:00
How does district of columbia v heller relate to federalism
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:40
What role did radio free europe play in western countries' cold warstrategy?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:20
Montesquieu suggested dividing government into
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00
What’s the reason for not digging up aztec ruins in modern mexico city
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Alvarado was charged and put on trial for murder. His attorney believed that Alvarado's confession s...
Questions
question
Computers and Technology, 26.07.2019 15:00
Questions on the website: 13722363