In 1832 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia that the state of Georgia had no right to force the Cherokee from their native lands. Why did this ruling have little positive effect?

President Jackson did not enforce the ruling

Explanation:

In many scenario, it's one thing for the government to pass rules, then it's also another entire situation for this rules to be enforced to bring forth result. In so society where the citizens are stubborn in a way, they would need proper follow up on the implemented rules in order to get result. This is what's applicable to the paragraph above, the President didn't enforce the ruling so it had little or no effect.

question 1: paragraph 3

question 2: paragraph 2

question 3: paragraph 1

hope this !

can you me on my ss question?