Please help me anyone

1. Economic

2. It was where the roman empire began

Explanation:

"Eastern Empire had a more established urban culture and greater financial resources (given the gold mines in Thrace and near Constantinople) compared to the West, thereby allowing the Imperial government in Constantinople more leeway in trying to maintain control, and also in paying off barbarians to avoid the problems that would beset the financially destitute West.

Combined with a lack of mass Germanic migration into their territories, the Eastern Roman Empire was thus in a much better position to survive the collapse of the Empire."

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

answer: i dont know

explanation:

unyuoinjk

kn,khftdctfjvgkbhlnjmk,l; jnhgbfdcsedrftgyuij; okpl'iuytredtwsdeyrfuijkol'

[olp