Question 10 of 10 A business must decide whether to open a new office in China. If it opens the
branch, it will increase its chances of selling a high volume of its products in
China. On the other hand, the business will have to spend a lot of money to
make the branch operational.
What would be an opportunity cost for the business if it chooses not to open
the new branch in China?
A. The business would increase its marginal benefits on each
product it makes
B. The business would lose the chance to make more money in
China
0 C. The business would have to open a new branch in a different
country
0 D. The business would be able to use the money it saves on other
projects

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.