Federalist No. 51 argues that members of one branch should not be involved in the selection of members of another branch. Why, according to Federalist No. 51,is a "deviation" from this principle warranted in the case of the judiciary?

Answer and Explanation:

Deviation would be justified in the judiciary because the position of the judges is permanent, they do not need to swear loyalty to anyone, as they do not depend on who appointed them to maintain their positions. In that case, if there is a "deviantion" in the judiciary, people can be sure that the judges will act according to their own opinions and will not be obeying another person. In addition, members of the judiciary have their own qualifications, which prevents unnecessary deviations.

1.) question:

how was the agricultural revolution related to the industrial revolution?

d.) improved agriculture led to population growth, which increased demand for goods.

2.) question:

which of the following happened first in the events leading to american independence?

c.) the meeting of the first continental congress.

3.) question:

what was one advantage that cities offered businesses and industrialists?

answer:

d.) transportation networks

4.) question:

what economic philosophy developed in response to the problems of industrial workers?

a.) socialism

5.) question:

how does this image relate to the jacobins?

b.) the jacobins used this machine to scare and execute those who supported the king.

hope this !