HURRY I'LL GIVE BRAINLIEST As a means of suppressing the mob, put the race avenger politician out of business. The man who hopes to ride into office by inflaming race against race ought to be sat down upon. . . .

The bars on Decatur street, owned and operated by . . . foreigners, are the favorite rendezvous for criminals and loafers. These are the dens that need cleaning out. . . .

. . . The innocent must not be made to suffer with the brutes . . . . The individual fiend must be killed and his crime must not be charged to the entire race.

–Atlanta Independent,
September 29, 1906

In this article, the phrase "race avenger politician" is an example of

loaded language.
reasoned judgment.
a fact that can be proved.
a fact that can be observed.

Explain the difference between an independent and dependent sample. choose the correct answer below. a. in an independent sample, the individuals are chosen without replacement; in a dependent sample, the individuals are chosen with replacement. b. in a dependent sample, one would use a two-tailed hypothesis test; in an independent sample, one would use a one-tail hypothesis test. c. a sample is independent when an individual selected for one sample does not dictate which individual is to be in the second sample. a sample is dependent when an individual selected for one sample dictates which individual is to be in the second sample. d. a sample is independent when an individual selected for one sample dictates which individual is to be in the second sample. a sample is dependent when an individual selected for one sample does not dictate which individual is to be in the second sample. independent samples are often referred to as matched-pairs samples.

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

Which term describes a possible explanation of, or answer to, a scientific question that is based on prior knowledge or research and that is testable?