subject
Social Studies, 08.02.2021 17:40 ashtonbillups

When choosing their leaders, what do the citizens of South Africa and Nigeria have in common?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
After world war i, how did the allied countries hope to keep germany from becoming too powerful again? question 5 options: united states took over german military bases. germany was not allowed to have a large army or navy. germany was allowed to keep its colonies. germany did not have to pay any war debts to the allied countries.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50
Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:50
Martha entered into a contract with terry, an art dealer. according to the contract, terry was to supply 18 th century artifacts to martha for the play she was directing, and martha was ready to pay $50,000 for this. another director needed the same artifacts and was ready to pay $60,000. terry decided not to sell the artifacts to martha. in this case, the court may order terry to:
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:00
Are people more motivated to change from positive or negative experiences, like slavery, womens rights, and any other historical movements/moments? i need more factual information than opinions.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
When choosing their leaders, what do the citizens of South Africa and Nigeria have in common?...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 10.01.2021 15:30
question
Mathematics, 10.01.2021 15:30
question
Chemistry, 10.01.2021 15:30
question
Mathematics, 10.01.2021 15:30
question
Mathematics, 10.01.2021 15:30
question
English, 10.01.2021 15:30
question
Health, 10.01.2021 15:30
Questions on the website: 13722362