subject
Social Studies, 09.02.2021 08:00 HyperT1676

7 is the belief that Supreme Court justices should not
actively try to shape social and political issues or redefine the Constitution
judicial restraint
Judcial activism
senatorial courtesy
O habeas corpus

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:00
Did the writers of the declaration of independence accomplish their goals (did we get our independence and the new government we wrote about)?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:10
Who did not believe that land could not be owned
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 14:30
Horton automatics and the industrial division of the communications workers of america, the union that represented horton’s workers, negotiated a collective bargaining agreement. if an employee’s discharge for a workplace-rule violation was submitted to arbitration, the agreement limited the arbitrator to determining whether the rule was reasonable and whether the employee had violated it. when horton discharged employee ruben de la garza, the union appealed to arbitration. the arbitrator found that de la garza had violated a reasonable safety rule, but “was not totally convinced” that horton should have treated the violation more seriously than other rule violations. the arbitrator ordered de la garza reinstated. can a court set aside this order
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
7 is the belief that Supreme Court justices should not
actively try to shape social and polit...
Questions
question
English, 24.06.2019 01:30
question
Chemistry, 24.06.2019 01:30
question
Chemistry, 24.06.2019 01:30
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 24.06.2019 01:30
Questions on the website: 13722363