Social Studies, 12.02.2021 16:30 vlactawhalm29
Garp signed a contract with Tech Corp that had a binding arbitration clause. A dispute arose between Garp and Tech Corp and the matter was heard by an arbitrator. The arbitrator awarded Tech Corp $50,000. Under which of the following circumstances may a court judge set aside the award of the arbitrator in the hearing?
A. The arbitrator was biased against Garp because he is a man.
B. Both an arbitrator's refusal to hear relevant evidence that prejudices a party's rights and bias against one's gender are grounds for setting aside an arbitrator's award.
C. Under no circumstances, because Garp entered into the contract voluntarily and Congress has ruled that arbitration is preferred over litigation as a method of dispute resolution, and awards are not set aside by courts.
D. The arbitrator refused to hear relevant evidence that prejudiced Garp's rights.
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:30
Why is james madison significant in regards to the bill of rights?
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30
To take a standard test such as the psat or plan students must have an
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:00
The government has the right to restrict the number of people who visit the white house. this is an example of a government exercising its
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:50
The principle of checks and balances is based on the notion that
Answers: 1
Garp signed a contract with Tech Corp that had a binding arbitration clause. A dispute arose between...
Computers and Technology, 26.09.2019 10:30
Business, 26.09.2019 10:30
History, 26.09.2019 10:30
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 10:30
Chemistry, 26.09.2019 10:30
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 10:30
History, 26.09.2019 10:30
Biology, 26.09.2019 10:30
History, 26.09.2019 10:30
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 10:30
English, 26.09.2019 10:30
Physics, 26.09.2019 10:30
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 10:30