Which statement best describes how the order of events heightens tension in this passage?
Pyramus had left
a little later than his Thisbe had,
and he could see what surely were the tracks
of a wild beast left clearly on deep dust.
His face grew ashen. And when he had found
the bloodstained shawl, he cried: 'Now this same night
will see two lovers lose their lives.'
– "Pyramus and Thisbe,"
Ovid
O If Pyramus had left at the same time as Thisbe
might have seen that she was not killed by the
O If the lioness had arrived later, she would have
encountered Pyramus rather than Thisbe.
O If Pyramus had arrived earlier, he would have
the lion attack Thisbe.
O If Pyramus and Thisbe had arrived at the same
time, they would have encountered the lioness
together

It’s the first one

Aresearcher proposes to conduct a study at a foreign site. the research has been determined to be exempt from the federal regulations by institutional policy. according to federal regulations, is review required at the foreign site? if a proposed study qualifies for exemption, federal regulations do not require review at the foreign site where it will be conducted but still require review at the u.s. site by the institution’s irb. if a proposed study qualifies for exemption, federal regulations do not require review at the foreign site where it will be conducted. if a proposed study qualifies for exemption, federal regulations do require review at the foreign site where it will be conducted. if a proposed study qualifies for exemption, federal regulations do not require review at the foreign site where it will be conducted, but still require review by the institutional official at the local site.

If there were no system of checks and balance,the process of government would eventually fall apart. do you agree with this opinion? why or why not?

Cooperation among oligopolies runs counter to the public interest because it leads to underproduction and high prices. in an effort to bring resource allocation closer to the social optimum, public officials attempt to force oligopolies to compete instead of cooperating. consider the following scenario: suppose that the presidents of two auto manufacturing companies exchange text messages in which they discuss jointly raising prices on their new lines of hybrid suvs. this illegal communication would violate which of the following laws? the sherman antitrust act of 1890 the robinson–patman act of 1936 the celler–kefauver act of 1950 the clayton act of 1914