subject
Social Studies, 23.02.2021 23:20 ciel8809

Prompt:Squealer says that Napoleon thinks all animals are equal. But then he tells the animals that only Napoleon can be trusted to make decisions In 250 words, analyze this apparent contradiction. What does the excerpt have to say about leadership and power? Excerpt:

The whole farm was deeply divided on the subject of the windmill. Snowball did not deny that to build it would be a difficult business. Stone would have to be carried and built up into walls, then the sails would have to be made and after that there would be need for dynamos and cables. (How these were to be procured, Snowball did not say.) But he maintained that it could all be done in a year. And thereafter, he declared, so much labour would be saved that the animals would only need to work three days a week. Napoleon, on the other hand, argued that the great need of the moment was to increase food production, and that if they wasted time on the windmill they would all starve to death. The animals formed themselves into two factions under the slogan, "Vote for Snowball and the three-day week" and "Vote for Napoleon and the full manger." Benjamin was the only animal who did not side with either faction. He refused to believe either that food would become more plentiful or that the windmill would save work. Windmill or no windmill, he said, life would go on as it had always gone on—that is, badly.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40
Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries.your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for.in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
What percentage of roads in germany have no speed limit?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
Which example define natural rights ?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:50
The principle of checks and balances is based on the notion that
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Prompt:Squealer says that Napoleon thinks all animals are equal. But then he tells the animals that...
Questions
question
English, 05.11.2020 21:40
question
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 21:40
question
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 21:40
question
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 21:40
question
History, 05.11.2020 21:40
question
Social Studies, 05.11.2020 21:40
question
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 21:40
Questions on the website: 13722367