Can someone follow me pliz ​

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

This form of government has only a single political party. question 2 options: communist democratic autocratic parliamentary

Emma lives on a tight budget. she saves money and also makes intelligent choices when spending it. which statements describe emma's financial skills? select three options.emma is more prepared to meet her basic needs.emma is better prepared to avoid financial setbacks.emma is better able to avoid accumulating assets.emma is more prepared to face emergencies.emma is better able to avoid financial decision-making.