Read the government descriptions for the countries below. In the space provided, write the type of government and give a brief explanation to support your answer. Jordan
The monarch holds wide executive and legislative powers, including the appointment of the prime minister and all seats of the senate. The monarch approves and dismisses judges; signs, executes and vetoes all laws; and can suspend or dissolve parliament. The prime minister is responsible for advising the king and executing the executive daily tasks as head of the government.

Iran
Iran is a theocracy. According to its constitution, its laws and regulations must be based on Islamic criteria. The supreme leader exerts ideological and political control over a system dominated by a council of clerics who shadow every major function of the state. Iran has a president, but their powers are limited to what the clerics tell him to do.

Great Britain
After an election, the monarch selects, as prime minister, the leader of the party most likely to command a majority of MPs in the House of Commons. Members of the House of Commons are elected to office by the people. The House of Lords, the higher house of Parliament, are selected by members of the House of Commons.

Ethiopia
Ethiopia has a three branch government that is elected by the public. All members of the government come from the same political party, and a controlled by the country’s prime minister. There is a president, but even that position is controlled by the prime minister, giving him total authority over the government.

oka

Explanation:

tysm for the free 43 points

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

every society, in order to meet the needs of it's people, has to answer three basic questions:

- what should we produce?

- how should we produce it?

- for whom should we produce it?

this questions must be answered in order to, option b, aid in production decisions.

every country can't produce everything, no matter how rich their land is. it may be a matter of technology, resources or geographical conditions. so, these three questions must be resolved in order to get the most of the production of each land.

hope this !