Scientific laws are not exactly the same as scientific theories. The table below shows an example of a theory and an example of a law.
Claim X
Claim Y
Factors in an environment can cause shifts When rocks are deposited in layers, if they
in the genetic makeup of populations. This have not been disturbed, the oldest rock layer
leads to changes in species over time. is on the bottom and younger layers are above it.
Claim X is considered a theory and claim Y is considered a law. Which statement best explains why this is?
A.
Claim X states what always will happen, and claim Y attempts an educated guess of an event.
B.
Claim X makes a statement based on evidence, and claim Y makes a statement based on opinions.
C.
Claim X is based on explanations of a process and claim Y is based on direct observation.
D.
Claim X is based on experimentation, and claim Y is identical to a hypothesis.
Reset
Next Question

Awoman who was socialized from infancy to become a wife and mother settles comfortably into being a homemaker in her twenties and early thirties. however, her husband dies suddenly, and she finds that she must enter the paid labor force in order to support herself and her two children. this woman will most likely have to undergo a process of (1pts) question 19 - a woman who was socialized from infancy to become a wife and mother settles comfortably into being a homemaker in her twenties and early thirties. however, her husband dies suddenly, and she finds that she must enter the paid labor force in order to support herself and her two children. this woman will most likely have to undergo a process of select anticipatory socialization. as your answer anticipatory socialization. select socialization. as your answer socialization. select reverse socialization. as your answer reverse socialization. select resocialization. as your answer resocialization.

The two-factor theory of emotion was proposed by

Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?