Compare and contrast the Florida Constitution to the United States Constitution. Provide clear and specific examples. Compare and contrast the powers of the Governor as stated in the Florida Constitution to the powers of the President as stated in the United States Constitution
Based on your comparison, which elected official has more power? Provide clear and specific examples to support your answer
Create a two-column chart that summarizes what you learned about the Florida Constitution and the United States Constitution in Standard 3.13
What are the responsibilities of the federal, state, and local government? Provide clear and specific examples
What are reserved, concurrent, and expressed powers? Provide clear and specific examples
Using your own words, define federalism and provide a specific and clear example of how it affects your life.

world war i had a devastating effect on german-americans and their cultural heritage. up until that point   german-americans, as a group, had been spared much of the discrimination, abuse, rejection, collective mistrust experienced by so many different racial and ethnic groups in the history of the united states. indeed, over the years, they had been viewed as a well integrated and esteemed part of american society. all of this change with the outbreak of war.  

its d i know cause i've been googling it

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.