Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:30
What is the difference between binding and non-binding arbitration? a. non-binding arbitration means that the arbitration hearing is not held in a court room. b. binding arbitration means that the parties have agreed they will not challenge in court the ruling from the arbitration c. binding arbitration exists only at the appellate level of the court system. d. non-binding arbitration occurs when the court does not have jurisdiction over one of the parties in the arbitration.what is the difference between binding and non-binding arbitration? a. non-binding arbitration means that the arbitration hearing is not held in a court room. b. binding arbitration means that the parties have agreed they will not challenge in court the ruling from the arbitration c. binding arbitration exists only at the appellate level of the court system. d. non-binding arbitration occurs when the court does not have jurisdiction over one of the parties in the arbitration.
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
Aman is charged a fee by the city for having numerous broken cars and auto parts in his front yard. which of the following correctly best describes why the city punish him? he has committed a crime. he is in violation of a city statute. he has violated an amendment of the u.s. constitution. a judge has decided that he is in violation of civil law.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:30
You are a migrant worker from india who has come to key wait image and you do you are you most likely to seek work
Answers: 1
Who held political power in greek city-states?...
Mathematics, 12.12.2020 15:50
Chemistry, 12.12.2020 15:50
English, 12.12.2020 15:50
Chemistry, 12.12.2020 15:50
Spanish, 12.12.2020 15:50
Mathematics, 12.12.2020 15:50
Mathematics, 12.12.2020 15:50
Mathematics, 12.12.2020 15:50
English, 12.12.2020 15:50
English, 12.12.2020 15:50
Mathematics, 12.12.2020 15:50
Business, 12.12.2020 15:50