Visited, Not Yet Judged 7.Not Answered 8.Not Answered 9.Not Answered 10.Not Answered 11.Not Answered 12.Not Answered 13.Not Answered 14.Not Answered 15.Not Answered 16.Not Answered 17.Not Answered 18.Not Answered 19.Not Answered 20.Not Answered 21.Not Answered 22.Not Answered 23.Not Answered 24.Not Answered 25.Not Answered 26.Not Answered 27.Not Answered 28.Not Answered 29.Not Answered 30.Not Answered Question Workspace Economics is best described as the: a. study of the development of human society. b. branch of science that is based on value judgments. c. study of the composition and structure of matter. d. branch of science that uses the principles of sociology. e. study of choice when scarcity exists.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

answer; u.s senate;

answerelitism;