The fifth way derives from facts about the governance of the world. We see that even things that lack consciousness, such as physical objects, act for a purpose. They almost always act in the same way, and they tend towards what is best. And this shows that they achieve their ends, not by chance, but on purpose. But something that lacks consciousness can tend towards an end only if directed by something with consciousness and intelligence. (Thus, the arrow must be directed by the archer.) There therefore is some intelligence which directs everything in nature towards an end, and this we call God. What is the conclusion of the argument presented in this passage

Plz me asap! and plz put a real answer! which of the following best describes richard russell's contribution to the war effort? by serving on the senate's naval affairs committee, he investigators learn how the pearl harbor attack was carried out. by to establish military bases like georgia's fort benning, he the state become an important resource to the federal government. by traveling to the war's regions, he develop maps of europe and the pacific. by working with his state's shipyards, he was able to obtain federal contracts to supply the military with ships built in savannah and brunswick.

Name that largest artificial lake built in the 11th century

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.