subject
Social Studies, 12.03.2021 16:20 losalobos46

The citizens of the United States cherish sentiments the most friendly in favor of the liberty and happiness of their fellowmen (Europeans) on the other side of the Atlantic. In the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with our policy to do so…. With the existing colonies or dependencies of any European power we have not interfered and shall not interfere. But with the Governments in the Americas who have declared their independence and maintain it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just principles, acknowledged, we could not view any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or controlling in any other manner, by any European power, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30
The following legal claims exist for m. finger co. identify the accounting treatment for each claim as either (a) a liability that is recorded or (b) an item described in notes to its financial statements. 1. m. finger (defendant) estimates that a pending lawsuit could result in damages of $1,250,000; it is reasonably possible that the plaintiff will win the case. an item described in notes to its financial statements. a liability that is recorded. 2. m. finger faces a probable loss on a pending lawsuit; the amount is not reasonably estimable. a liability that is recorded. an item described in notes to its financial statements. 3. m. finger estimates damages in a case at $3,500,000 with a high probability of losing the case. an item described in notes to its financial statements. a liability that is recorded. the amount that m. finger co. should record in its accounting records related to these suits is:
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:30
What is the supreme court case of smith vs robinson about?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 15:00
Norman jones, an economic historian at the university of utah, has described the views of the ancient greek philosopher aristotle on interest: aristotle defined money as a good that was consumed by use. unlike houses and fields, which are not destroyed by use, money must be spent to be used. there- fore, as we cannot rent food, so we cannot rent money. moreover, money does not reproduce. a house or a flock can produce new value by use, so it is not unreasonable to ask for a return on their use. money, being barren, should not, therefore, be expected to produce excess value. thus, interest is unnatural. what did aristotle mean in arguing that money is “barren”? why would money being barren mean that lenders should not charge interest on loans? do you agree with aristotle’s reasoning? briefly explain.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 15:30
As part of the gulf war, the us came to the aid of kuwait during operation desert storm in 1991. which number represents the country that invaded kuwait? a) 2 b) 3 c) 4 eliminate d) 5
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The citizens of the United States cherish sentiments the most friendly in favor of the liberty and h...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 26.01.2021 03:00
question
Mathematics, 26.01.2021 03:00
question
Mathematics, 26.01.2021 03:00
question
Arts, 26.01.2021 03:00
Questions on the website: 13722367