Scenario 1: A soccer player chants before a soccer match. Scenario 2: A woman refuses to stand during a moment of silence.
Scenario 3: Jewish and Muslim leaders participate in a memorial service
What is reflected in the scenarios above?

A: Popular sovereignty
B: Religious persecution
C: Separation of church and state
D: Free exercise of religion

The answer is option "C"

Explanation:

popular sovereignty is the rule that the authority of a state and its administration are made and supported by the consent of its people, through their chosen agents (rule by the individuals), who are the wellspring of all political force. popular sovereignty communicates an idea, and doesn't really reflect or depict a political reality.

To discuss popular sovereignty is to put extreme expert in the individuals. There are an assortment of manners by which power might be communicated. It could be quick as in individuals make the law themselves, or intervened through delegates who are dependent upon political decision and review; it very well might be extreme as in individuals have a negative or blackball over enactment, or it very well might be something significantly less sensational. So, mainstream sway covers a large number of institutional prospects. For each situation, in any case, popular sovereignty accepts the presence of some type of famous assent, and it is thus that each meaning of conservative government infers a theory of consent.

I think the answer is B: Religious persecution. But I'm not sure.

Explanation:

6.3%

explanation:

the acceptance rate for yale university is 6.3%. this means that only 6 percent of people who apply actually get accepted!