What was the dream that you used with the Dream Dictionary about (if you are not comfortable disclosing the dream skip this question and start with the next one)? What did the Dream Dictionary say about the dream’s meaning? How might this fit into what you learned about dreaming in the chapter readings? You should cite your textbook as your source for this part. What dream theory would the dream best fall under? Do you believe that dreams have real meaning? Why or why not? Do you see any problems associated with the Dream Dictionary and other websites like it? If so, what?

Answer and Explanation:

1. The dream I used in the dream dictionary, was a dream in which a cat I was raising had been stolen.

2. According to the dictionary of dreams, dreaming about cats means an independent spirit, creativity and power. In this sense, to dream that a cat is being lost, means that I am losing my independence and power, as well as my free spirituality and creativity.

3. In this way, we can affirm that my dream fits into the theory of dreams addressed by Freud, who affirms that dreams are part of our subconscious, since the loss of these factors is a fear that I believe I am going through.

4. I believe that dreams can have real meaning with a person's state of mind, but this is not always real, as dreams are often confusing and not very interpretive.

5. I do not believe that sites that promote the meaning of dreams are harmful, as long as they are consulted in a recreational way. However, examining them in a professional manner is incorrect as there is no certainty that these sites were created by professionals.

answer: what do you mean

explanation:

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: